Most organizations have been short-sold on NAC: they bought into zero trust control, but are stuck with overpriced visibility - and your credibility gets judged on outcomes, not intent.

Monitor mode is a sensible starting point, until it becomes a parking lot. And it often stays there because of a KPI trap: measure teams on “incident-free time” and you unintentionally train them to ignore what they find.

That’s not a neutral phase. It’s a ticking time bomb.

What it costs: you keep paying for the platform, you keep paying in engineer time to triage noise and manage exceptions, and you keep carrying the exposure. When a breach happens, “we saw it in monitor mode” isn’t a defense. And when an audit lands, intent doesn’t reduce scope. You pay in incident blast radius, downtime, remediation, and reputation.

In this fireside chat for senior IT, security and network leaders, we’ll unpack:

• Real-world examples of what goes wrong when NAC is deployed but left in monitor-only mode
• The workarounds teams use to keep the business moving (and how they turn into compliance exposure)
• The commercial case for prioritizing and resourcing enforcement

Register now to sharpen the internal case for enforcement.

We’ll give you the language, metrics, and narrative that turns a stalled NAC program into an approved, resourced plan - grounded in real-world examples, common workaround patterns, and the KPIs that prove progress without “block everything” chaos.