The problem or challenge: CCPM effectively manages flow, but it assumes the project team is already aligned, capable, and collaborative. In reality, the human side of projects—the team itself—is often the hidden constraint. Misaligned team composition, poor communication, and lack of learning during execution stall performance, regardless of how well the schedule is managed. The solution or TOC concept: By integrating Doug Wilde’s Teamology, a method to build cognitively diverse teams based on Jungian typology, and embedding structured peer learning into project flow, we can evolve CCPM to address the human constraint. This approach aligns with TOC’s core principle: focus on the real constraint to improve throughput. The implementation or case example: I will share a proposed pilot where one CCPM team operates as usual, and another applies the A-Team framework: Teamology-informed design, a co-created team charter, peer learning rituals (like feedback circles and “hotseats”), and psychological safety checks. The aim is not just faster delivery but smarter, self-improving teams. The actionable takeaway: Attendees will leave with a simple, replicable framework for building A-Teams: - How to use typology to design better teams - How to embed learning rituals into project cycles - How to measure team functioning alongside buffer burn - And how evolving CCPM in this way can dramatically boost project velocity and long-term team effectiveness.to breakthroughs — fast.