Special Offer: Get 50% off your first 2 months when you do one of the following
Personalized offer codes will be given in each session
Dr. Volkmar Kreisel
About This Webinar
Laser Field Therapy LFT - The Effects of NIR Photobiomodulation on the Autonomic Nervous System depending on Continuous Wave or Pulsed Mode
Who can view: People who attended or registered for the webinar only
Webinar Price: Free
Featured Presenters
MD, Vice President of the International Society for Medical Laser Applications
Dr. Kreisel is Vice President of ISLA transcontinental (International Society for Medical Laser Applications), Chairman and founding member of COLLL (College of Low Level Laser Therapy), member of the Scientific Advisory Board of INAURIS (International Network for Controlled Implant Acupuncture) and Head of the Clinic for Integrative Medicine in Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany. He holds a lectureship for Laser Medicine at the Danube University Krems, Austria, and is author of several books and papers on PBM, Laser Acupuncture and Laser Field Therapy. He is an internationally recognized speaker and expert in PBM Therapy.
Dr. Kreisel received his medical doctor degree in Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Intensive Care Medicine. He was Senior physician at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the Julius Maximillian University of Würzburg, Germany, and CEO/Medical Head of the S-thetic Clinic Stuttgart, Germany. For more than 20 years his research is focused on PBM and its integration into Pain Management and innovative medical treatment concepts.
Dr. Kreisel received his medical doctor degree in Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Intensive Care Medicine. He was Senior physician at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the Julius Maximillian University of Würzburg, Germany, and CEO/Medical Head of the S-thetic Clinic Stuttgart, Germany. For more than 20 years his research is focused on PBM and its integration into Pain Management and innovative medical treatment concepts.
Conversation
12:17 PM - Sunday - October 3, 2021
Thank you for your lecture sharing your research. A few questions I would be interested in hearing your insight.
1. Do you think a strong LED array (similar parameters and irradiance power) that is placed on the solar plexus area would have a similar effect in activating the PNS or would it need to be laser shower?
2. Should we focus on time (10min) or total joules (630J). (yes, I know, both) I notice in Oshiros paper for the priority proximal approach he used to activate PNS and increase blood also used the solar plexus as one of his locations (along with the carotid and stellate ganglia). His device ... delivering 60 mW in continuous wave at a wavelength of 830 nm in the near infrared with a power density at the tip of the probe head of approximately 1.2 W/cm2.
Under the author's PPLT concept, the brain is the control center for the body so every other part of the body is distal to the head. The main blood supply to the head is through the carotid arteries, and the deep penetration of the 830 nm beam applied to the side of the neck can involve and photoactivate the external and internal carotids, increasing the blood supply to the brain and creating a systemic parasympathetic system-mediated whole-body effect. The author has added gentle neck-stretching, trunk-stretching and his distal tissue softening approaches concomitant with the irradiation which enhance treatment efficacy.
He used it for 5 min each location so time was half, 5 minutes compared to 10 minutes over solar plexus and his total joules would have been 18J
Was there a reason for choosing 630J or the time for 10 minutes. Did you think less time would have provided different results?
Again thank you for your talk.
Lorne
1. Do you think a strong LED array (similar parameters and irradiance power) that is placed on the solar plexus area would have a similar effect in activating the PNS or would it need to be laser shower?
2. Should we focus on time (10min) or total joules (630J). (yes, I know, both) I notice in Oshiros paper for the priority proximal approach he used to activate PNS and increase blood also used the solar plexus as one of his locations (along with the carotid and stellate ganglia). His device ... delivering 60 mW in continuous wave at a wavelength of 830 nm in the near infrared with a power density at the tip of the probe head of approximately 1.2 W/cm2.
Under the author's PPLT concept, the brain is the control center for the body so every other part of the body is distal to the head. The main blood supply to the head is through the carotid arteries, and the deep penetration of the 830 nm beam applied to the side of the neck can involve and photoactivate the external and internal carotids, increasing the blood supply to the brain and creating a systemic parasympathetic system-mediated whole-body effect. The author has added gentle neck-stretching, trunk-stretching and his distal tissue softening approaches concomitant with the irradiation which enhance treatment efficacy.
He used it for 5 min each location so time was half, 5 minutes compared to 10 minutes over solar plexus and his total joules would have been 18J
Was there a reason for choosing 630J or the time for 10 minutes. Did you think less time would have provided different results?
Again thank you for your talk.
Lorne
1:50 PM - Saturday - October 2, 2021
Why not use the vagus innervated skin area on ear? Like it's done on electrical vagus nerve stimulaion.
Attended
(108)
Recommended